ABSTRACT
Considering the urgency of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, detection of new mutant strains and potential re-emergence of novel coronaviruses, repurposing of drugs such as ivermectin could be worthy of attention. This review article aims to discuss the probable mechanisms of action of ivermectin against SARS-CoV-2 by summarizing the available literature over the years. A schematic of the key cellular and biomolecular interactions between ivermectin, host cell, and SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 pathogenesis and prevention of complications has been proposed.Copyright © 2022 Japan Antibiotics Research Association. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The Editor-in-Chief has retracted this article. Following publication, concerns were raised regarding the methodology and the conclusions of this review article. Post-publication review confirmed that while the review article appropriately describes the mechanism of action of ivermectin, the cited sources do not appear to show that there is clear clinical evidence of the effect of ivermectin for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2. The Editor-in-Chief therefore no longer has confidence in the reliability of this review article. None of the authors agree to this retraction. The online version of this article contains the full text of the retracted article as Supplementary Information.Copyright © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the Japan Antibiotics Research Association 2021.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Information regarding the kinetics and longevity of acquired immunity in recovered COVID-19 patients requires thorough analysis and documentation. This is an update to an ongoing monocentric pilot observational study, that longitudinally analyzed the presence of antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 infection. STUDY DESIGN: Antibody titers against nucleocapsid protein (NCP) of SARS-CoV-2 analyzed at 8 months was followed by adoption of a more specific immunoassay, anti-Spike-Receptor binding domain IgG CLIA for analysis at 12 and 13 months post infection. METHODS: MAGLUMI® SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD IgG Chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) was adopted for measurement of antibody titres at 12 and 13 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: 97% (34 out of 35) patients resulted positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG at 12 and 13 months. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: In areas with vaccine and resource scarcity, vaccination could be prioritized for those individuals who have never been infected or for the ones who have recovered but show the absence of protective antibodies.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , Humans , Immunoglobulin G , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/chemistry , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/metabolismABSTRACT
Background: Information regarding the kinetics and longevity of acquired immunity in recovered COVID-19 patients requires thorough analysis and documentation. This is an update to an ongoing monocentric pilot observational study, that longitudinally analyzed the presence of antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Study design: Antibody titers against nucleocapsid protein (NCP) of SARS-CoV-2 analyzed at 8 months was followed by adoption of a more specific immunoassay, anti-Spike-Receptor binding domain IgG CLIA for analysis at 12 and 13 months post infection. Methods: MAGLUMI R SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD IgG Chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) was adopted for measurement of antibody titres at 12 and 13 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results: 97% (34 out of 35) patients resulted positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG at 12 and 13 months. Discussion and Conclusions: In areas with vaccine and resource scarcity, vaccination could be prioritized for those individuals who have never been infected or for the ones who have recovered but show the absence of protective antibodies.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: A large amount of recent research has focused on the nature of immunity elicited by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, particularly its robustness and the duration of protection it offers. As a vaccine's efficacy relies on its ability to induce a protective immune response, these questions remain particularly pertinent. An improved understanding of the immunity offered by the antibodies developed against SARS-CoV-2 in recovered patients is critical for the development of diagnostic tests and vaccines. Methods: Our study aimed at the longitudinal analysis of antibody presence, persistence and its trend over eight months in a group of 30 COVID-19 recovered patients who tested positive by real-time quantitative PCR for SARS-CoV-2 in the period 1-30 March 2020. The subjects were divided into two groups based on disease severity: mild (n=17 subjects) and moderately-severe (n=13 subjects). The MAGLUMI 2019-nCoV lgM/lgG chemiluminescent analytical system (CLIA) assay was used to analyze these antibody titres. Results: IgG antibody persistency was demonstrated in 76.7 % of the subjects (23 out of 30) at eight months post-infection. For the moderately-severe group, the titre trends for both IgM and IgG changed in a statistically significant way throughout the time period with IgM below and IgG above the set cut-off. Conclusions: The results of this study highlight an important point in terms of the association between humoral immune response and disease severity. Patients who have experienced a relatively severe infection might develop a stronger immune response that could persist for a longer period.